Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/749/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Itxa/749/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,City-Vii,Mumbai v. M/S Bhansali International Pvt.ltd

High Court 24 Sep 2014 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/749/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,City-Vii,Mumbai v. M/S Bhansali International Pvt.ltd
Date of order
24 Sep 2014
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/749/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,City-Vii,Mumbai v. M/S Bhansali International Pvt.ltd, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The Appeal is, therefore, dismissed accordingly.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

sbw *1* IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.749 OF 2004 Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant -Versus-M/s. Bhansali International Pvt. Ltd. ..Respondent ........... Mr. Suresh Kumar for the Appellant.Mr. A. K. Jasani for the Respondent. ........... CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARIAND A. K. MENON, JJ. DATE :- 24[th] SEPTEMBER, 2014 P.C.: 1]In the light of the Income Tax Appeal No.749 of 2004, this Appeal was admitted by this Court on a substantial question of law and formulated in para-5, the Appeal was admitted particularly because of the pending Reference to this Court. 2]Having heard Mr. Suresh Kumar, learned counsel, appearing for the Revenue and Mr. Jasani, learned counsel, appearing on behalf of the Assessee, we find that the question of law at page 5 of the present Appeal have already been answered by this Court in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax V/s. J. K. Investors Ltd. reported in 248 ITR 743. The very 1/2 same issue was subject matter of Income Tax Appeal No.1226 of 2008 filed by the Revenue. The very Assessee was before this Court in that Appeal as well. Following the judgment of Commissioner of Income Tax V/s. J.K. Investors Ltd., Appeal has been disposed of. 3]We would, therefore, follow the Division Bench judgment in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax V/s. J.K. Investors Ltd. (supra), the order in the case of the very Assessee in Income Tax Appeal No.1226 of 2008 dated 23[rd] September, 2009 and proceed to held that the substantial question of law as formulated in this Appeal is answered against the Revenue and in favour of the Assessee. The Appeal is, therefore, dismissed accordingly. No costs. (A. K. MENON, J.) (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.) wadhwa 2/2
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan