In Itxa/750/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-8, Mumbai v. Sm. Dyechem Limited, Mumbai, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Both the appeals are dismissed in limini with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.3016 OF 2008ANDINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.3017 OF2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax
..Appellant.
V/s.
SM Dyechem Ltd.
..Respondent.
Mr. Suresh Kumarfor appellant.
Mr. R.A. Shaikh for respondent.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 23RD SEPTEMBER, 2009.
P.C. :-
Heard learned counsel for the revenue. He fairly states that both the questions of law sought to be raised in the appeals are covered by the judgment of this Court in the case of CIT V/s. SM Dyechem Ltd. (assessee itself) in Income Tax Appeal (L) No.3018 of 2008 decided on 6[th] August, 2009. In this view of the matter, no substantial question of law arise in these appeals. Both the appeals are dismissed in limini with no order as to costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(V.C.DAGA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue