Itxa/751/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Central Iv v. Jsw Steel Ltd
High Court
05 Dec 2016 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/751/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Central Iv v. Jsw Steel Ltd
Date of order
05 Dec 2016
Assessment year(s)
2004-05, 2007-08
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Itxa/751/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Central Iv v. Jsw Steel Ltd, the High Court (2016) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: 5.Thus, the appeal is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 751 OF 2014
Commissioner of Income Tax,Central-IV, Mumbai
v/s.
JSW Steel Ltd.
.. Appellant
.. Respondent
Mr. Tejveer Singh for the appellant Mr. Atul Jasani for the respondent
P.C.
CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & A.K. MENON, J.J.
DATED : 5[th] DECEMBER, 2016.
1.This Appeal under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) challenges the order dated 19[th] November, 2013 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (the Tribunal). The impugned order is in respect of Assessment Year 2004-05.
2.Mr. Tejveer Singh, learned Counsel for the Revenue urges only
the following question of law for our consideration :-
(i)Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal was justified in directing the Assessing Officer to grant the interest u/s 244A without appreciating the fact that the self-assessment tax is not contemplated to be covered under clause (b) of Section 244A(1) and only the refund arising out of the payments made on account of post-assessment taxes are included in its scope?”
3.Mr. Tejveer Singh, learned Counsel for the Revenue very fairly states that the impugned order of the Tribunal allowed the respondent assessee's appeal by following its order in the case of the same respondent assessee for Assessment Year 2007-08. Mr. Singh, further states that being aggrieved by the order of the Tribunal for A.Y. 2007-08, the respondent assessee had filed an appeal to this Court being Income Tax Appeal No.2379 of 2013 wherein an identical question of law was raised as in this petition. However, this Court by order dated 25[th] July, 2016 did not entertain the Revenue's appeal, being Income Tax Appeal No.2379 of 2013.
4.In the above view, for the reasons indicated in our order dated 25[th] January, 2016 the question as proposed does not give rise to any substantial question of law.
5.Thus, the appeal is dismissed. No order as to costs.
(A.K. MENON, J.)
(M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.