In Itxa/755/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-15,Mum v. M/S Zam Zam Enaterprises, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is, therefore, dismissed in limini with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.755 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax
V/s.
M/s. Zam Zam Enterprises
..Appellant.
..Respondent.
Ms.Anuradha Mane for appellant.Mr.Jitendra Jain i/b. Joy Legal Consultants for respondent.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 12TH JUNE, 2009.
P.C. :-
1.Heard learned counsel or the revnue. The appeal is filed against the order of remand. Having gone through the impugned order on the factual aspects, no fault can be with the said order. No substantial question of law arises in this appeal and nothing is put before us to point out how the revenue is aggrieved by the I.T.A.T. order. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed in limini with no order as to costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue