Itxa/757/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -25 Mumbai v. Shri Vipul J. Sheth
High Court
06 Jul 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/757/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -25 Mumbai v. Shri Vipul J. Sheth
Date of order
06 Jul 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itxa/757/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -25 Mumbai v. Shri Vipul J. Sheth, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is, therefore, dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.757 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax
..Appellant.
V/s.
Shri Vipul J. Sheth
..Respondent.
Mrs. Suchitra Kamble for appellant.None for respondent.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 6TH JULY, 2009.
P.C. :-
Heard learned counsel for the revenue. The question sought to be raised in this appeal is relating to the justification of deletion of the sum of Rs.27,37,500/- made on account of alleged unaccounted income from the sale of jewellery declared under VDIS, 1997. The Tribunal has taken a view that so long as certificate issued under section 68 of the VDIS is not cancelled and is holding the field, the department is precluded from treating the said certificate as not subsisting. Similar view also taken by this Court in the case of Uma Corporation V/s. Krishna Prabhakar, AssistantCommissioner of Income Tax & Ors. reported in (2006 ) 284 ITR 67 (Bom). In this view of the matter, no fault can be found with the order of the Tribunal. We find no substance in the appeal. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed with no order as to costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.