Case Law › High Court › Itxa/757/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Itxa/757/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax City-2, Mumbai v. The Dharamsi Morarji Chemical Co. Ltd

High Court 01 Apr 2008 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

01 Apr 2008

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

Case summary

In Itxa/757/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax City-2, Mumbai v. The Dharamsi Morarji Chemical Co. Ltd, the High Court (2008) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Appeal is allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARYORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG) NO.388 OF 2005 INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG) NO.388 OF 2005 INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG) NO.388 OF 2005 The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant. V/s. M/s.Dharmasi Morarji Chemical Co. Ltd. ..Respondent. Ms.P.P.Bhosale with P.S.Sahadevan for appellant. Ms.V.B.Patel for respondent. CORAM : DR. S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED : 1ST APRIL, 2008. CORAM : DR. S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 1ST APRIL, 2008. P.C. :- P.C. :- . Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel for the respondent. As the tax effect is less than Rs.4 lakhs, learned counsel for the appellant seeks leave to withdraw the appeal. Appeal is allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such with no order as to costs. 2. Permissible Court fees be refunded as per rules. (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.