In Itxa/760/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-3, Mumbai v. M/S. Bajaj Hindustan Ltd., Mumbai, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In this view of the matter, the appeal is dismissed is limini with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.760 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax
V/s.M/s. Bajaj Hindustan Ltd.
..Appellant.
..Respondent.
Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for appellant.Ms.Vasanti Patel for respondent.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 12TH JUNE, 2009.
P.C. :-
1.Heard learned counsel for the parties. Both the parties agree that the issue sought to be raised in the above appeal is covered by two judgments of the Supreme Court, one in the case of Malayala Manorama Co.Ltd. V/s. C.I.T. reported in [2008] 300 I.T.R. 252 (SC)and another in the case of Apollo Tyres Ltd. V/s. C.I.T.reported in [2002] 255 I.T.R. 273. In this view of the matter, the appeal is dismissed is limini with no order as to costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue