In Itxa/761/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-4, Mumbai v. M/S. Pradeep Syntex Pvt Ltd., Mumbai, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is, therefore, dismissed in limini with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1607 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax..Appellant. V/s.M/s.Pradeep Syntex Pvt. Ltd...Respondent.Mr.Vimal Vupta for appellant.None for respondent.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 24TH JUNE, 2009.
P.C. :-
1.Heard learned counsel for the revenue. Office objectins are overruled. Registry is directed to register the appeal.
2.The appeal is taken upon for hearing at the instance of learned counsel for the revenue. He fairly states that the issue sought to be raised in the appeal is covered by the Division Bench judgment of this Court in the case of CIT V/s. Walfort Share and Stock BrokersP. Ltd. reported in [2009] 310 I.T.R. 421.In this view of the matter no substantial question of law arise in this appeal. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed in limini with no order as to costs.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue