Itxa/764/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -3 v. M/S Tresta T Rading Pvt. Ltd
High Court
12 Jun 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/764/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -3 v. M/S Tresta T Rading Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
12 Jun 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itxa/764/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -3 v. M/S Tresta T Rading Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is, therefore, dismissed in limine with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
The Commissioner of Income Tax..Appellant.
M/s.Tresta Trading Pvt. Ltd...Respondent.
Mr.Vimal Gupta i/b. Devaki Iyer for appellant.Mr.J.D.Mistry i/b. Raj Darak for respondent.
P.C. :-
1.Heard learned counsel for the appellant and the respondent. By the impugned order, the Tribunal has dismissed two appeals one is the present appeal filed against M/s. Tresta Trading Pvt. Ltd. and another appeal filed against Yangste Trading Pvt. Ltd.
2.So far as the question of law sought to be
raised relating to Yangste Trading Pvt. Ltd. in Income Tax Appeal No.1029 of 2007 is concerned, the same was dismissed by this Court on 22/04/2009 holding that as the Tribunal had relied upon the judgment of the Apex Court
in C.I.T. V/s. Max India reported in (2007) 295 I.T.R.
282 (SC), the view taken by the Tribunal cannot be faulted. In this view of the matter, no substantial
question of law arise in this appeal. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed in limine with no order as to costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.