Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/766/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Itxa/766/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S J.b.boda And Company Pvt. Ltd

High Court 13 Aug 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/766/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S J.b.boda And Company Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
13 Aug 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/766/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S J.b.boda And Company Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

1/2 ITXA-765-2009 ITXA-766-2009 (SR.69) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 765 OF 2009ALONGWITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 766 OF 2009 The Commissioner of Income-TaxCentral-II...Appellant V/s. M/s. J.B. Boda & Company P. Ltd. ….Respondent None for the appellant. * * * * * * Mr. Rajesh Poojary I/by. MINT & CONFERES, Advocate for the respondent. Coram : M.S. Sanklecha, & Sandeep K. Shinde, JJ. Monday, 13th August, 2018. P.C. : 1.None appeared in support of the Appeals when it was first called out. It was kept back. On being called thesecond time, again none appears in support of the Appeals. Rane 2/2ITXA-765-2009ITXA-766-2009 (SR.69) 2.It appears, the appellant is not desirous ofprosecuting these Appeals. This particularly in view of thefact that Advocate and parties were put to notice on 3[rd]August, 2018 that these Appeals would be taken up forconsideration today. Appeals dismissed for non-prosecution. (SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J) (M.S. SANKLECHA, J) NeetaShaileshSawant Digitally signedby NeetaShaileshSawantDate:2018.08.1611:52:40 +0530
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan