Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/768/2008 Of The Commissioer Of Inco...

Itxa/768/2008 Of The Commissioer Of Income-Tax-2,Mum v. Shri Brij Kishore Soni

High Court 29 Apr 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/768/2008 Of The Commissioer Of Income-Tax-2,Mum v. Shri Brij Kishore Soni
Date of order
29 Apr 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/768/2008 Of The Commissioer Of Income-Tax-2,Mum v. Shri Brij Kishore Soni, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The appeal is, therefore, dismissed in limini with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.768 OF 2008 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.768 OF 2008 The Comissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant. V/s. Shri Brij Kishore Soni ..Respondent. Mr.Vimal Gupta i/b. P.S.Sahadevan for appellant. Mr.Ajay R. Singh for respondent. CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 29TH APRIL, 2009. P.C. :- P.C. :- 1. Heard learned counsel for the revenue. Having seem the order of the Tribunal and the findings recorded, it is clear that it revolves around the appreciation of evidence in the facts and circumstances of the case. One cannot presume that payment may not have been made by the assessee of his liabilities to his creditors. No facts are brought to the contrary to show that the creditors were non existent and that the loan borrowed were time barred. As such, we do not see any substantial question of law arise in this appeal. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed in limini with no order as to costs.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan