In Itxa/768/2008 Of The Commissioer Of Income-Tax-2,Mum v. Shri Brij Kishore Soni, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is, therefore, dismissed in limini with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.768 OF 2008
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.768 OF 2008
The Comissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant.
V/s.
Shri Brij Kishore Soni ..Respondent.
Mr.Vimal Gupta i/b. P.S.Sahadevan for appellant.
Mr.Ajay R. Singh for respondent.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 29TH APRIL, 2009.
P.C. :-
P.C. :-
1. Heard learned counsel for the revenue.
Having seem the order of the Tribunal and the findings
recorded, it is clear that it revolves around the
appreciation of evidence in the facts and
circumstances of the case. One cannot presume that
payment may not have been made by the assessee of his
liabilities to his creditors. No facts are brought to
the contrary to show that the creditors were non
existent and that the loan borrowed were time barred.
As such, we do not see any substantial question of law
arise in this appeal. The appeal is, therefore,
dismissed in limini with no order as to costs.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.