Itxa/769/2002 Of Vihjay Piramal v. The Income Tax Officer
High Court
13 Sep 2004 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/769/2002 Of Vihjay Piramal v. The Income Tax Officer
Date of order
13 Sep 2004
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itxa/769/2002 Of Vihjay Piramal v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2004) decided the matter.
Decision: The appeal is dismissed in limine.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.769 OF 2002
Vijaya Piramal .. Appellant.
V/s.
The Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(1) .. Respondent.
Mr.Rajesh Shah for the appellant.
Mr.R.V. Desai, Senior counsel with Ms.S.V. Bharucha
i/b. P. Kapur for the respondent.
CORAM : R.M. LODHA, &
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 13TH SEPTEMBER, 2004.
P.C. :
Heard.
2. The learned counsel for the assessee-
appellant could not dispute that the controversy
raised in this appeal is squarely concluded by the
division bench judgment of this court in the case of
Mrs.Alpana Chinai V/s. Income-tax Officer [269 ITR
123]. Thus, the view of the tribunal cannot be
faulted.
3. No substantial question of law arises in
this appeal. The appeal is dismissed in limine.
(R.M. LODHA, J.)
2
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue