Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/77/2003 Of Mont Blanc Properties In...

Itxa/77/2003 Of Mont Blanc Properties Industries Pvt.ltd v. The Assistant Commissione Of Income Tax,Circle-5

High Court 14 Oct 2004 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/77/2003 Of Mont Blanc Properties Industries Pvt.ltd v. The Assistant Commissione Of Income Tax,Circle-5
Date of order
14 Oct 2004
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Itxa/77/2003 Of Mont Blanc Properties Industries Pvt.ltd v. The Assistant Commissione Of Income Tax,Circle-5, the High Court (2004) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.77 OF 2003 Mont Blanc Properties & IndustriesPrivate Limited v/s. The Assistant Commissioner ofIncome tax, Range 5(2), Mumbai .. Appellant .. Respondent Mr.P.Pardiwala i/by M/s.Kotangale & Co. forappellant. Mr.R.V.Desai, senior counsel with Ms.S.V.Bharuchai/by Mr.P.Kapur for respondent. CORAM: R.M.LODHA ANDJ.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED:14thOctober, 2004 P.C. passed in respect of Income tax appeal No.7639/Bom/95. not sufficiently explained. consideration of the matter on sufficiency of thecause is concluded on facts. 4. No substantial question of law arises. Appealis dismissed in limine.5. The excess court fee, if any, paid by theappellant may be refunded to the appellant since the present appeal has been confined to the appeal arising out of the appeal No.7639/Bom/95. (R.M.LODHA, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan