Itxa/77/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 3, Mumbai v. M/S Icici Bank Ltd
High Court
23 Apr 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/77/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 3, Mumbai v. M/S Icici Bank Ltd
Date of order
23 Apr 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itxa/77/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 3, Mumbai v. M/S Icici Bank Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: The appeal seeks to raise the following questions of law :- " Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the ITAT was right in confirming CIT(A)’s order and thereby holding that the interest of PSU bonds was not chargeable to tax under the interest Tax Act, 1974 in as much as the...
Decision: Appeal is dismissed in limini with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.77 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s.ICICI Bank Ltd. ..Respondent.
Mr.Vimal Gupta for appellant.
Mr.S.J.Mehta for respondent.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA ANDJ.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 23RD APRIL, 2009.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 23RD APRIL, 2009.
P.C. :-
P.C. :-
1. Heard learned counsel for the rival
parties. The appeal seeks to raise the following
questions of law :-
" Whether in the facts and circumstances of
the case and in law, the ITAT was right in
confirming CIT(A)’s order and thereby
holding that the interest of PSU bonds was
not chargeable to tax under the interest
Tax Act, 1974 in as much as the same could
not be classified as interest on loans and
advances u/s.2(7) of Interest Tax Act,
1974?"
2. The question sought to be raised is covered
by the judgment of the Lucknow Bench in the case ofCommissioner of Income-tax (Central), Kanpur V/s.
- = : 2 : = -
Sahara India Mutual Benefit Co. Ltd. reported in[2006] 153 Taxman (All). The Tribunal has also relied
Sahara India Mutual Benefit Co. Ltd.
[2006] 153 Taxman (All).
upon the very same Judgment. The said judgment is
also affirmed by the Apex Court. In this view of the
matter, we do not see any substantial question of law.
Appeal is dismissed in limini with no order as to
costs.
(V.C.DAGA, J.)
(V.C.DAGA, J.)
(V.C.DAGA, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.