Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/774/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Itxa/774/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii v. Chhatrapati Rajaram Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Kasaba Bawada

High Court 16 Jul 2007 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/774/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii v. Chhatrapati Rajaram Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Kasaba Bawada
Date of order
16 Jul 2007
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Itxa/774/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii v. Chhatrapati Rajaram Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Kasaba Bawada, the High Court (2007) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Issue: The question of law as formulated in this appeal reads as under : 2 Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal, relying on the decision of Chhatrapati SSK Ltd.

Decision: Impugned order is set aside.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.774 OF 2004 The Commissioner of Income Tax .. Appellant. V/s. Shri Chhatrapati Rajaram SSK Ltd. .. Respondent. Mr.B.M. Chatterjee with Mrs.P.P. Bhosale i/by Pankaj Kapoor for the appellant. Mr.S.N. Inamdar with Mr.A.K. Jasani for the respondent. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 16TH JULY, 2007. P.C. : 1. Admit. Heard forthwith. 2. The issue in this appeal is covered by the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Siddheshwar Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Limited V/s. CIT and CIT V/s. Shri Chatrapati Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Limited reported in [2004] 270 ITR 1 (SC) as followed by this Court in the case of CIT V/s. Malegaon Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Limited reported in [2005] 279 ITR 19 (Bom). 3. The question of law as formulated in this appeal reads as under : 2 Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal, relying on the decision of Chhatrapati SSK Ltd. (245 ITR 498)(Bom) was right in deleting the following addition by holding that the fund collected by the assessee society out of the sugar cane purchase price payable to the cane-growers is not trading receipts of the assessee ? i] Cane Development Fund Rs.4,65,566/- 4. In view of the aforesaid judgments, the appeal is remanded back to the Tribunal for denovo consideration in accordance with law. 5. Impugned order is set aside. The appeal is allowed. There shall be no order as to costs. (F.I. REBELLO, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan