Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/774/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Itxa/774/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-Tds v. M/S Makan Investment And Tradig Co Ltd

High Court 05 Aug 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/774/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-Tds v. M/S Makan Investment And Tradig Co Ltd
Date of order
05 Aug 2011
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Itxa/774/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-Tds v. M/S Makan Investment And Tradig Co Ltd, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: DATED : 5TH AUGUST, 2011 P.C. :- 1.Whether the ITAT was justified in setting aside the order passed by the assessing officer under Section 201 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, is the question raised in this appeal.

Decision: The appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.774 OF 2009 The Commissioner of Income Tax-TDS..Appellant. V/s. M/s. Makan Investment & Trading Co. Ltd...Respondent. Mr. Suresh Kumar for the appellant. Dr. Shivram with Paras Savla i/b. Ajay R. Singh for the respondent. CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND A.A. SAYED, JJ. DATED : 5TH AUGUST, 2011 P.C. :- 1.Whether the ITAT was justified in setting aside the order passed by the assessing officer under Section 201 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, is the question raised in this appeal. 2.In the present case, the assessee had made remittances to M/s. Integrated Call Management (I) Pvt. Ltd. without deducting tax at source and, therefore, proceedings were initiated and an order was passed against the assessee under Section 201 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 3.The finding of fact recorded by the ITAT is that in the present case, the payee i.e. the recipient had filed an application under Section 197 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and admittedly, even before the amounts were remitted by the assessee, a certificate was issued by the assessing officer to the effect that the recipient is entitled to receive the amount without deducting tax at source. In these circumstances, the order of the ITAT in setting aside the order passed by the assessing officer under Section 201 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 cannot be faulted. In the result, we see no merit in the appeal. The appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. (A.A. SAYED, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan