Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/776/2012 Of Commissioner Of Income...

Itxa/776/2012 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax - 1 v. M/S. National Organic Chemical Industries Ltd

High Court 12 Mar 2013 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/776/2012 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax - 1 v. M/S. National Organic Chemical Industries Ltd
Date of order
12 Mar 2013
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Itxa/776/2012 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax - 1 v. M/S. National Organic Chemical Industries Ltd, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: In this Appeal by the Revenue for the Assessment Year 2000- 01, following question has been raised for our consideration:- Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal was justified in allowing expenditure of Rs.1,77,25,542/- being consultancy and advisory fees...

Decision: 4Accordingly, appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.776 OF 2012 Commissioner of Income Tax-1..Appellant.V/s.M/s. National Organic Chemical Industries Ltd...Respondent. Mr. Suresh Kumar, for the Appellant.Mr. Ajit Shah with Mr. S. M. Iyer, for the Respondent. P.C:- CORAM: J.P.DEVADHAR & M.S.SANKLECHA,JJ.DATE : 12[th] MARCH, 2013. In this Appeal by the Revenue for the Assessment Year 2000- 01, following question has been raised for our consideration:- Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal was justified in allowing expenditure of Rs.1,77,25,542/- being consultancy and advisory fees paid to various persons during the year for modernization of project as deduction even though such expenditure was clearly capital in nature? 2Counsel for the parties are agreed that an identical issue was raised by the Revenue in Income Tax Appeal No. 2441 of 2011 filed against the same Respondent-Assessee. This Court by its order dated 7[th ]March, 2013 in Income Tax Appeal No.2441 of 2011 refused to entertain the above question. 3In these circumstances, we see no reason to entertain the proposed question of law. 4Accordingly, appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. (M.S.SANKLECHA,J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan