Itxa/78/2003 Of Olympus Trading P.ltd v. The Assitt. Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Central Circle-9,Mumbai
High Court
17 Sep 2004 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/78/2003 Of Olympus Trading P.ltd v. The Assitt. Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Central Circle-9,Mumbai
Date of order
17 Sep 2004
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Itxa/78/2003 Of Olympus Trading P.ltd v. The Assitt. Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Central Circle-9,Mumbai, the High Court (2004) decided the matter.
Decision: Appeal is dismissed in limine.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYO.O.C.J.
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.78 OF 2003
M/s. Olympus Trading Co.P.Ltd.
... Appellant
v/s.The Assistant Commissioner ofIncome-tax, Central Circle-9,Mumbai.... Respondent
Mr.K.B.Bhujale for appellant.
Mr.R.V.Desai with Mr.R.Asokan i/by Mr.P.Kapur forrespondent.
CORAM: R.M.LODHA ANDJ.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED:17thSeptember, 2004
P.C.
Heard.2. We do not find any illegal infirmity in theorder of the Tribunal. The assessee has miserablyfailed to prove by legal evidence that the paymentof commission amounting in all to Rs.6,40,704.32 tosix parties were in fact paid to them for the
services rendered by them.
3. No substantial question of law arises. Appeal
is dismissed in limine.
(R.M.LODHA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue