Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/789/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Itxa/789/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax City-Ii, Mumbai v. M/S. Bank Of India

High Court 11 Sep 2007 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/789/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax City-Ii, Mumbai v. M/S. Bank Of India
Date of order
11 Sep 2007
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Itxa/789/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax City-Ii, Mumbai v. M/S. Bank Of India, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.789 OF 2004 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.789 OF 2004 The Commissioner of Income-Tax ..Appellant. V/s. M/s.Bank of India ..Respondent. Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for appellant. Mr.S.S. Shetty for respondent. CORAM : F.I.REBELLO ANDJ.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 11TH SEPTEMBER, 2007. DATED : 11TH SEPTEMBER, 2007. P.C. :- P.C. :- Considering the liberty granted by the Tribunal as set out in para 4 of the order dated 18th September, 2003 the question of law as formulated in the present case would not arise. Appeal is liable to be dismissed. 2. Liberty granted in terms of order granted by the Tribunal. 3. Appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (F.I.REBELL0, J.) (F.I.REBELL0, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan