Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/792/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Itxa/792/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -12 v. Omprakash Bagadia

High Court 13 Oct 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/792/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -12 v. Omprakash Bagadia
Date of order
13 Oct 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/792/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -12 v. Omprakash Bagadia, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Appeal is, therefore, dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX The Commissioner of Income Tax-12. ... Appellant. V/s. Omprakash Bagadia. ... Respondent. R.A.Vaishyampayan for the appellant. Sameer Dalal for the respondent. CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN and V.C.DAGA, JJ. CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN and V.C.DAGA, JJ. DATED : 13th October 2008. DATED : 13th October 2008. DATED : 13th October 2008. P.C. :---- P.C. : ---- . Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel for the respondent. 2. By the above appeal, the appellant is seeking to raise the following question of law: "Whether in the facts and circumstances and in law, the Tribunal is right in allowing the appeal of the respondent thereby allowing the short term loss claimed by the respondent? 3. We have perused the impugned order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 29th April, 2005 and, especially, paragraph- 4 thereof. It is a mere finding of fact. No substantial question of law is involved in the appeal. Appeal is, therefore, dismissed.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan