Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/793/2002 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Itxa/793/2002 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,City-Xiii v. Salim S.topiwala

High Court 14 Sep 2004 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/793/2002 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,City-Xiii v. Salim S.topiwala
Date of order
14 Sep 2004
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Itxa/793/2002 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,City-Xiii v. Salim S.topiwala, the High Court (2004) decided the matter.

Decision: Appeal is dismissed in limine.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.793 OF 2002 The Commissioner of Income Tax,Mumbai... Appellantv/s.Shri Salim Topiwala.. RespondentMr.R.Asokan i/by Mr.K.B.Rao for appellant. P.C. Heard. CORAM: R.M.LODHA ANDJ.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED:14thSeptember, 2004 2. The issue raised in this appeal standsconcluded by the Division Bench judgment of thiscourt in the case of Cadell Weaving Mill Co.P.Ltd.v. Commissioner of Income Tax and anr., 249 ITR265. However, the learned counsel for the revenuesubmits that the said judgment is under challengebefore the Supreme Court.3. Even if that be so, in so far as we areconcerned, the matter stands concluded by theDivision Bench judgment of this court. 4. No substantial question of law arises. Appeal is dismissed in limine. (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan