Itxa/793/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Hotel Mayfair Pvt. Ltd
High Court
15 Jun 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/793/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Hotel Mayfair Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
15 Jun 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itxa/793/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Hotel Mayfair Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Accordingly, the Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Rane* 1/2 * ITXA—793-2004 (SR.81)Friday, 15.6.2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 793 OF 2004
The Commissioner of IncomeTax, Central-I, Mumbai….AppellantV/s.M/s. Hotel Mayfair Pvt. Ltd.….Respondent
None for the appellant.
* * * * *
Mr. Yash Mehta i/by. Thakore Jariwala & Associates, Advocate for the respondent.
P.C. :-
1. When this Appeal was called out earlier, none
appeared in support of the Appeal. At the bottom of the board, this Appeal was again called out and again none appears in support of the Appeal.
Rane
* 2/2 *
ITXA—793-2004 (SR.81)
Friday, 15.6.2018
2.
The parties and advocates had been put to
notice on 30[th] May, 2018 that this matter would be taken up today. Inspite of the above, none appears in support of the Appeal. It appears, the appellant is not interested in
prosecuting the Appeal. Accordingly, the Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
(SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J)
(M.S. SANKLECHA, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.