In Itxa/793/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 4 Mumbai v. Pragya Securities Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: For the reasons stated therein, the present appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
sas
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.793 OF 2010
The Commissioner of Income Tax-4, Mumbai
..Appellant.
V/s.
Pragya Securities Pvt. Ltd.
..Respondent.
Mr. Vimal Gupta for the appellant.
Mr. S.C. Tiwari and Meghana Butala for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND A.A.SAYED, JJ.
DATED : 21ST OCTOBER, 2011
P.C. :-
Counsel for the revenue fairly states that the question raised by the revenue in this appeal is covered against the revenue by the judgment of this Court in the case of CIT V/s. M/s. Kotak Securities Ltd. [Income Tax Appeal No.3111 of 2009] decided by us today i.e. 21st October, 2011. For the reasons stated therein, the present appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.
(A.A.SAYED, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue