Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/802/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Itxa/802/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Central 3 Mumbai v. Brinks Arya India Pvt Ltd

High Court 29 Mar 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/802/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Central 3 Mumbai v. Brinks Arya India Pvt Ltd
Date of order
29 Mar 2011
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Itxa/802/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Central 3 Mumbai v. Brinks Arya India Pvt Ltd, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: DATED : 29TH MARCH, 2011 P.C. :- 1.Whether the Tribunal was justified in holding that the assessee is entitled to higher depreciation at 40% when the assessee was not engaged in the business of giving the vehicles on hire, is the question raised in these appeals.

Decision: All the appeals are dismissed with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.802 OF 2010 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.613 OF 2010 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.820 OF 2010 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1198 OF 2010 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.4283 OF 2009 The Commissioner of Income Tax, Central III, Mumbai. ..Appellant. V/s. M/s. Brinks Arya India Pvt. Ltd. ..Respondent. Mr. B.M. Chatterjee with Mrs. Padma Divakar for the appellant. Mr. Y.P. Trivedi, senior Advocate with Usha Dalal for the respondent. CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND SMT. R.S. DALVI, JJ. DATED : 29TH MARCH, 2011 P.C. :- 1.Whether the Tribunal was justified in holding that the assessee is entitled to higher depreciation at 40% when the assessee was not engaged in the business of giving the vehicles on hire, is the question raised in these appeals. The Tribunal has held that the assessee has proved that the security vans have been used for transportation of cash, valuables belonging to the third parties as that is the business of the assessee. This fact is not disputed. Thus, the decision of the Tribunal is based on finding of fact and no substantial question of law arise in these appeals. All the appeals are dismissed with no order as to costs. (SMT. R.S. DALVI, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan