Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/807/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Itxa/807/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 3 Mumbai v. Kankdhara Traders Pvt. Ltd

High Court 08 Feb 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/807/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 3 Mumbai v. Kankdhara Traders Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
08 Feb 2011
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/807/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 3 Mumbai v. Kankdhara Traders Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: In this view of the matter, the present Appeal is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.760 OF 2010 The Commissioner of Income Tax-3 Mumbai ..... Appellants V/s. Kankdhara Traders Pvt. Ltd., ..... Respondents ---- Mr.Vimal Gupta for the appellants. Mr.J.D.Mistry, Sr.Counsel @ Mr.P.C.Tripathi i/by Raj Darak for the respondents. ---- CORAM : J.P.DEVADHAR & MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ. DATE :8/2/ 2011 P.C. 1. In this case the Tribunal has set aside the assessment order passed under Section 143 (3) read with Section 263 of the Income Tax Act on the ground that the order of CIT under Section 263 has been set aside by the Tribunal by its order dated 5.10.2009. The appeal filed by the Revenue against the order of ITAT setting aside the order of CIT being Tax Appeal No.7000 of 2010 has been dismissed by us today. Since the order of CIT under Section 263 does not exist the on the ground that the order of CIT under Section 263 has been set aside by the Tribunal by its order dated 5.10.2009. The appeal filed by the Revenue against the order of ITAT setting aside the order of CIT being Tax Appeal No.7000 of 2010 has been dismissed by us today. Since the order of CIT under Section 263 does not exist the assessment order passed pursuant to the order of CIT cannot be sustained. 2. In this view of the matter, the present Appeal is dismissed. (MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,J) (J.P.DEVADHAR,J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan