Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/82/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Inco...

Itxa/82/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 18, Mumbai v. M/S Atlas Exporters

High Court 19 Jul 2017 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/82/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 18, Mumbai v. M/S Atlas Exporters
Date of order
19 Jul 2017
Assessment year(s)
1999-2000
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Itxa/82/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 18, Mumbai v. M/S Atlas Exporters, the High Court (2017) decided the matter.

Decision: 3.In view of the above, the appeal stands disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 82 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax-18 .. Appellant v/s. M/s. Atlas Exporters .. Respondent None for the petitioner Mr. V.S. Hadade for the respondent CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA & A.M. BADAR, J.J. P.C. DATED : 19[th] JULY, 2017 1.The order of the Tribunal is assailed in the present appeal. The Tribunal has passed a common order for Assessment Years 1998-99 and 1999-2000. The learned Counsel for the respondent assessee submits that the appeal filed by the Revenue for A.Y. 1999-2000 is rejected by this Court on 24[th] July, 2008 bearing Income Tax Appeal No.165 of 2008. 2.The learned Counsel for the appellant submits that the tax effect involved in the present appeal is less than Rs.20 lakhs and as per the CBDT Circular No.21 of 2015 dated 10[th] December, 2015, the department has taken a policy decision not to prosecute the appeals wherein the tax effect is less than Rs.20 lakhs. 3.In view of the above, the appeal stands disposed of. (A.M. BADAR, J.) (S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan