Itxa/825/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-Ii, Pune v. M/S.photon Construction Pvt Ltd, Pune
High Court
04 Aug 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/825/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-Ii, Pune v. M/S.photon Construction Pvt Ltd, Pune
Date of order
04 Aug 2016
Assessment year(s)
1997-98
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itxa/825/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-Ii, Pune v. M/S.photon Construction Pvt Ltd, Pune, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Be that as it may, appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.825 OF 2011
The Commissioner of Income Tax-II, PuneVersusM/s. Photon Construction Pvt. Ltd.
..Appellant
..Respondent
None for the appellant.
...........
...........
CORAM: M. S. SANKLECHA &
A. K. MENON, JJ.
P.C.:
DATE : 4[th] AUGUST, 2016
1.This Appeal relates to Assessment Year 1997-98.
2.None appears for the Revenue in support of the appeal. It appears that the Revenue is not interested in prosecuting the present appeal. This possibly for the reason that the tax effect in the present appeal is Rs.7.04 lakhs as indicated in para 11 of the appeal memo, and therefore, within the threshold limited provided under the Circular No.21 of 2015 dated 10[th] December, 2015 issued by the Central Board for Direct Tax for the purposes of not pressing/withdrawing the appeals. Be that as it may, appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
(A. K. MENON, J.)
(M. S. SANKLECHA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue