Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/828/2012 Of Commissioner Of Income...

Itxa/828/2012 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax - 2 v. Shri Pradeep K. Vakharia,Jt.managing Director, Ashapura Shipping Ltd

High Court 12 Sep 2014 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/828/2012 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax - 2 v. Shri Pradeep K. Vakharia,Jt.managing Director, Ashapura Shipping Ltd
Date of order
12 Sep 2014
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/828/2012 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax - 2 v. Shri Pradeep K. Vakharia,Jt.managing Director, Ashapura Shipping Ltd, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

kps IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.828 OF 2012 The Commissioner of Income Tax. ..Appellant -Versus-Pradeep K. Vakharia, Joint Managing Director,Ashapura Shipping Limited. ..Respondent ........... Mr.Suresh Kumar, for the Appellant. ........... CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARI AND A.K. MENON, JJ. DATE :- 12[th] September, 2014 P.C.: 1Having heard Mr.Suresh Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the Revenue in support of this Appeal and finding that the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), as also, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal rendered the concurrent view based on the facts that we are of the opinion that the present Appeal does not raise any substantial question of law. The source of funds from which the gift emanated, acquaintance or rather the parties being known to each other has been established and particularly in the report of remand submitted by the Assessing Officer to the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). Hence, no reliance could have been placed by the Revenue on the earlier exercise undertaken by the Assessing Officer. The explanation which has been given and noted in the Tribunal's as also in the Commissioner's orders and findings based thereon does not raise any substantial question of law enabling us to admit this Appeal. It is, accordingly, dismissed. No costs. (A.K. MENON, J.) (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan