Itxa/83/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -Iii Pune v. Ganesh Nagari Sahakari Pat Sanstha Ltd
High Court
11 Jan 2012 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/83/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -Iii Pune v. Ganesh Nagari Sahakari Pat Sanstha Ltd
Date of order
11 Jan 2012
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itxa/83/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -Iii Pune v. Ganesh Nagari Sahakari Pat Sanstha Ltd, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is accordingly dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
sas
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.83 OF 2011
The Commissioner of Income Tax-III, Pune
..Appellant.
V/s.
Shri Ganesh Nagari Sahkari Patsanstha FruitSection Market Yard.
..Respondent.
Mr. Vimal Gupta for the appellant.None for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND A.R. JOSHI, JJ.DATED : 11TH JANUARY, 2012
P.C. :-
In all four questions of law are raised by the revenue in this
appeal. From the order passed by the ITAT, it is seen that the Tribunal has followed the judgment of this Court in the case of CIT V/s. Bandhkam Khate Sevakanchi Sahakari Patsanstha Maryadit [Income
Tax Appeal No.156 of 2009] decided on 18/3/2009. Since the decision of the ITAT is based on the judgment of this Court, we see no reason to entertain this appeal. The appeal is accordingly dismissed with no order as to costs.
(A.R. JOSHI, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue