Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/833/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Itxa/833/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 9, Mumbai v. M/S Geepee Steels Pvt. Ltd

High Court 06 Oct 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/833/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 9, Mumbai v. M/S Geepee Steels Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
06 Oct 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/833/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 9, Mumbai v. M/S Geepee Steels Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: In the above appeal, the appellant is seeking to raise the following questions of law: (A) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in deleting the disallowance of deduction of Rs.10,25,073/- under section 80IA of the Income Tax Act?

Decision: Appeal is, therefore, dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL NO. 833 OF 2008 INCOME TAXAPPEAL NO. 833 OF 2008 INCOME TAX The Commissioner of Income Tax. ... Appellant. V/s. M/s.Geepee Steels Pvt.Ltd. ... Respondent. P.S.Sahadevan for the appellant. Sameer G. Dalar for the respondent. CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN and V.C.DAGA, JJ. CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN and V.C.DAGA, JJ. DATED : 6th October 2008. DATED : 6th October 2008. DATED : 6th October 2008. P.C. : P.C. :---- ---- . Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel for the respondent. 2. In the above appeal, the appellant is seeking to raise the following questions of law: (A) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in deleting the disallowance of deduction of Rs.10,25,073/- under section 80IA of the Income Tax Act? (B) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in deleting the disallowance of deduction of Rs.2,36,793/- under section 80IA of the Income Tax Act? 3. We have perused the impugned judgment of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 28th September, 2007. Perusal of paragraph- 6 thereof clearly indicates that so far as question No.1 is concerned, the Tribunal has remanded the said issue to the file of the assessing officer to verify the statement of claim of the assessee and pass an appropriate order. In view thereof, the said question does not survive. 4. So far as second question is concerned, the Tribunal has clearly reiterated the finding that income was derived from the business of the industrial undertaking and not from the industrial undertaking itself for claiming deduction under section 80IA of the Income-tax Act. 5. In view of the above finding of fact, we do not find any substantial question of law involved in the appeal. Appeal is, therefore, dismissed. (V.C.DAGA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan