Itxa/835/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-8, Mumbai v. M/S. Kabra Extrusiontechnik Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai
High Court
06 Jul 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/835/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-8, Mumbai v. M/S. Kabra Extrusiontechnik Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai
Date of order
06 Jul 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itxa/835/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-8, Mumbai v. M/S. Kabra Extrusiontechnik Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Under these circumstances, we have no option but to dismiss all the appeals holding it to be barred by limitation.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2947 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax
..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s. MAN Industries (Indial Ltd. ..Respondent.
Mr.Suresh Kumar for appellant.
Mr.P.V.Bhujle and K.B.Bhujle for respondent.
AND
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2848 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s. Krishna Suppliers Ltd. ..Respondent.
Mr.Suresh Kumar for appellant.
None for respondent.
AND
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2949 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s. Kabra Extrusiontechnik Pvt. Ltd. ..Respondent.
Mr.Suresh Kumar for appellant.
Mr.P.C.Tripathi for respondent.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 6TH JULY, 2009.
P.C. :-
1.In all these appeals, there is a delay of three years in filing the appeals. No Notice of Motions have been taken out. At least no statement to that effect is being made. Under these circumstances, all the appeals are liable to be dismissed being barred by limitation for want of Notice of Motions seeking condonation of delay.
2.It appears from para 7 of the memo of appeals that there is a ground of delay but no prayer for condoning the delay is made, No material is placed explaining the reasons for the delay in filing the appeals. No separate affidavits explaining the reasons for delay in filing the appeals are filed. Under these circumstances, we have no option but to dismiss all the appeals holding it to be barred by limitation.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.