In Itxa/836/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -9, Mumbai v. M/S Ahalya Trading P Ltd., Mumbai, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is, therefore, dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.836 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax
..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s.Ahalya Trading P. Ltd...Respondent.
Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for appellant.None for respondent.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 18TH JUNE, 2009.
P.C. :-
1.Heard learned counsel for the revenue. After going through the order of the Tribunal, we find that the the question revolved around the findings of fact recorded by the Tribunal based on the appreciation of evidnce. In this view of the matter, no substantial question of law is involved in this appeal. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed with no order as to costs.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue