Itxa/839/2007 Of The Commissionr Of Income-Tax-I,Pune v. Dr Padmashri V. Vikhepatil Sah. S.k. Ltd
High Court
25 Jun 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/839/2007 Of The Commissionr Of Income-Tax-I,Pune v. Dr Padmashri V. Vikhepatil Sah. S.k. Ltd
Date of order
25 Jun 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itxa/839/2007 Of The Commissionr Of Income-Tax-I,Pune v. Dr Padmashri V. Vikhepatil Sah. S.k. Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 3.In view of the above, we are not inclined toentertain the above Appeal and the same is dismissed. : 2 : [A.V.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.839 OF 2007
The Commissioner of Income Tax - 1,Pune
.
...Appellant
V/s.Dr.Padmashri Vithalrao Vikhe Patil.Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd., Ahmednagar...Respondent
Mr.Vimal Gupta, Advocate, for the Appellant.None for the Respondent.
P.C. :
CORAM : DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN &A.V. NIRGUDE, JJ.DATE : 25TH JUNE, 2008.
.Heard the learned Counsel for the Appellant.
2.Mr.Gupta, the learned Counsel for theAppellant, states that the question of law involved inthe above Appeal is squarely covered against theRevenue and in favour of the assessee by the judgmentof this Court in the case of Commissioner of Income-TaxV/s. Manjara Shetkari Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd.[(2008) 301 ITR 191 (Bom)].
3.In view of the above, we are not inclined toentertain the above Appeal and the same is dismissed.
: 2 :
[A.V. NIRGUDE, J.] [DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.