Itxa/839/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 1, Pune v. Intermedia Cable Communication Pvt. Ltd
High Court
12 Sep 2014 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/839/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 1, Pune v. Intermedia Cable Communication Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
12 Sep 2014
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itxa/839/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 1, Pune v. Intermedia Cable Communication Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The Appeals are, therefore, devoid of any merits and are dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
kps
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.838 OF 2012WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL NOS.839/2012, 844/2012, 845/2012, 846/2012, 847/2012 and 848/2012
The Commissioner of Income Tax.
..Appellant
-Versus-Intermedia Cable Communication Pvt.Ltd....Respondent
...........
Mr.Vimal Gupta, Senior Advocate i/by Mr.Vipul Arun Bajpayee, for the Appellant.Mr.Mandar Vaidya, for the Respondent.
...........
CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARI
AND A.K. MENON, JJ.
DATE :- 12[th] September, 2014
P.C.:
1We have heard Mr.Vimal Gupta, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the Appellant/ Revenue and with his assistance we have perused the common order which has been passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal.
2The only ground which, according to the Revenue, raises a substantial question of law has been dealt with by the Tribunal and in dealing with that it has rendered a factual conclusion, namely, in the absence of any material to indicate that the Revenue doubted the accounts of the Assessee there was no basis for the estimation. The estimation also has to be some foundation. We do not see as to how such findings of fact and which are rendered from paragraph 32 onwards can be said to be
raising a substantial question of law. The findings are consistent with the material placed, therefore, cannot be termed as perverse or vitiated by any error of law apparent on the face of the record. The Appeals are, therefore, devoid of any merits and are dismissed. No costs.
(A.K. MENON, J.)
(S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.