Itxa/840/2007 Of Commissioner Of Income-Tax-11,Mum v. Arthur Andersen And Co

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.7 OF 2007WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1466 OF 2005WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1467 OF 2005WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.510 OF 2006WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.840 OF 2007 Commissioner of Income Tax-XI Vs.Arthur Andersen & Co. ..Appellant ..Respondent Mr.A.D.Kango with Mr.P.S.Sahadevn for the Appellant.Mr.S.E.Dastur, Senior Advocate with Mr.JitendraJain & Mr.Ricab Chand i/b.DSK Legal for the Respondent. CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ.DATE : 31ST MARCH, 2008 P.C. 1.Heard the learned Counsel for the Appellantand the learned Senior Counsel for the Respondent. Wehave perused paragraph No.3 of the order dated 31stMay, 2005 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal,wherein, the Tribunal had relied on its earlier orderdated 31st December, 2004 passed in the Assessee’s owncase No.ITA No.6192/Mum/2004 and ITA No.1785/Mum/2002and disposed of the Assessee’s case.2.Both the learned Counsel for the Appellant andthe learned Senior Counsel for the Respondentcategorically state that the substantial question of :2: in accordance with law. The Appeals stand disposed of accordingly. (J.P.DEVADHAR,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)