In Itxa/841/2002 Of Pal Credit And Capital Ltd v. Asst. Comm. Of Income Tax, the High Court (2017) decided the matter.
Decision: 2The appeal, as such, is disposed of as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDITION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.841 OF 2002
Pal Credit and Capital Limited...Appellant
V/s.
The Assistant Commissioner of Income-Tax,Central Circle 22, Mumbai...Respondent
.....
Mr.Atul K. Jasani, Advocate for the Appellant.
None for the Respondent.
....
CORAM :S.V.GANGAPURWALA &A.M.BADAR JJ.
DATED :6[th] July 2017.
P.C.
1Mr.Jasani, the learned counsel for the Appellant states that he has instructions to withdraw the appeal.
2The appeal, as such, is disposed of as withdrawn.
3No costs.
4Court fees as per rules, be refunded.
( A.M.BADAR J.)
( S.V.GANGAPURWALA J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue