Itxa/844/2011 Of M/S. A.g. Developers v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax City -Xii
High Court
03 Dec 2012 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/844/2011 Of M/S. A.g. Developers v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax City -Xii
Date of order
03 Dec 2012
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Itxa/844/2011 Of M/S. A.g. Developers v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax City -Xii, the High Court (2012) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Accordingly, the appeal is allowed to be withdrawn with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
itxa844-11
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.844 OF 2011
M/s. A.G. Developers
..Appellant.
V/s.
The Commissioner of Income Tax, City XII, Mumbai
..Respondent.
Mr. Jitendra Jain i/b. Kanga & Co. for the appellant.Mr. D.K. Kamwal for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND M.S. SANKLECHA, JJ.
DATED : 3RD DECEMBER, 2012
P.C. :-
1.Since the assessing officer has given substantial relief while implementing the order of the ITAT, which is impugned in the above appeal counsel for the appellant seeks to withdraw the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed to be withdrawn with no order as to costs.
2.Refund of Court fees as per rules.
(M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue