Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/845/2016 Of The Principal Commissio...

Itxa/845/2016 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-28 v. Surendra Ludhani

High Court 17 Dec 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/845/2016 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-28 v. Surendra Ludhani
Date of order
17 Dec 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/845/2016 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-28 v. Surendra Ludhani, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: 3.Accordingly, the Appeal is dismissed as not pressed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

Priya Soparkar 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.845 OF 2016 The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-28… Appellant V/s.Mr.Surendra Ludhani … Respondent … Respondent --- Mr.N.C.Mohanty for the Appellant. --- CORAM : AKIL KURESHI AND M.S.SANKLECHA, JJ. DATE : DECEMBER 17, 2018. P.C.:- 1.This Appeal under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act,1961 (the Act) challenges the order passed by the Income TaxAppellate Tribunal (the Tribunal). 2.Mr.Mohanty, learned Counsel appearing for the Revenuestates that he has been instructed not to press this appeal. Thisfor the reason that the tax effect in this appeal is less than Rs.50lakhs as provided in CBDT Circular No.3 of 2018 dated 11[th] July,2018. Mr. Mohanty tenders an affidavit of the PrincipalCommissioner of Income Tax dated 17[th] December, 2018 pointing Priya Soparkar out that the tax effect is below Rs.50 lakhs and by mistake theappeal memo indicated tax effect in excess of Rs.50 lakhs. 3.Accordingly, the Appeal is dismissed as not pressed. 4.Refund of Court Fees, as per Rules. (M.S.SANKLECHA,J.) (AKIL KURESHI,J.) ….
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan