Itxa/852/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central-Ii v. M/S. Tolaram And Co
High Court
01 Oct 2014 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/852/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central-Ii v. M/S. Tolaram And Co
Date of order
01 Oct 2014
Assessment year(s)
2003-04
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itxa/852/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central-Ii v. M/S. Tolaram And Co, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
sbw
*1*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.852 OF 2012
Commissioner of Income Tax,Central-II...Appellant
-Versus-M/s. Tolaram & Co...Respondent
...........
Mr. A. R. Malhotra with Ms. Padma Divakar for the Appellant.Mr. A. K. Jasani for the Respondent.
...........
CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARIAND A. K. MENON, JJ.
DATE :- 1[st] OCTOBER, 2014
P.C.:
1]The two questions of law which arise out of the order passed by the Tribunal dated 19[th] October, 2011 relating to assessment year 2003-04 are formulated at page 7 and 8 of the paper book.
2]When the Appeal was placed for admission, it was fairly stated that the issues are answered by this Court in favour of the Assessee and against the Revenue in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax V/s. M/s. Brahma Associates reported in (2011) 333 ITR 289 and the two Appeals which have been decided by a common judgment and order in Income Tax Appeal No.201 of 2012 in the case of The Commissioner of
1/2
Income Tax-16 V/s. M/s. Happy Home Enterprises and in Income Tax Appeal No.308 of 2012 in the case of The Commissioner of Income Tax, Central-II, Mumbai V/s. M/s. Kanakia Spaces Pvt. Ltd.
3]In view thereof and the questions having been answered against the Revenue and in favour of the Assessee, the present Appeal does not raise any substantial question of law. It is, accordingly, dismissed. No costs.
(A. K. MENON, J.)
(S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
wadhwa
2/2
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.