In Itxa/879/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -2 v. Gopal Goa Buildcon Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In this view of the matter, both the appeals are dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL(LOD) NO.1664 OF 2010ANDINCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.1665 OF 2010
The Commissioner of Income Tax-2,
..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s. Gopal Goa Buildcon Pvt. Ltd.
..Respondent.
Ms. Padma Divakar for appellant.
Mr. K./B. Bhujle and P.V. Bhujle for respondent.
CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND
SMT. R.S. DALVI, JJ.
DATED : 14TH MARCH, 2011
P.C. :-
1.Counsel appearing for the parties state that the questions raised in these appeals are covered against the revenue by the decision of this Court in the case of CIT V/s. Brahma Associates in Income Tax Appeal No.1194 of 2010 decided on 22/02/2011. In this view of the matter, both the appeals are dismissed with no order as to costs.
(SMT. R.S. DALVI, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue