Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/89/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Inco...

Itxa/89/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -7, Mumbai v. Nalini Properties Pvt. Ltd. , Mumbai

High Court 22 Apr 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/89/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -7, Mumbai v. Nalini Properties Pvt. Ltd. , Mumbai
Date of order
22 Apr 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/89/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -7, Mumbai v. Nalini Properties Pvt. Ltd. , Mumbai, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: The basic question raised in this appeal is, whether the undisclosed income of Rs.3,17,53,495/- is liable to be taxed in the hands of the respondent company or its director Mr.Sudhakar T.Pendse.

Decision: In this view of the matter, we see no merits in the present appeal and the same is hereby dismissed with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.89 OF 2009 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.89 OF 2009 The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant. V/s. Nalini Properties Pvt. Ltd. ..Respondent. Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for appellant. Mr.K.Gopal with Jitendra Singh for respondent. CORAM : V.C.DAGA ANDJ.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 22ND APRIL, 2009. CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 22ND APRIL, 2009. P.C. :- P.C. :- P.C. :- 1. The basic question raised in this appeal is, whether the undisclosed income of Rs.3,17,53,495/- is liable to be taxed in the hands of the respondent company or its director Mr.Sudhakar T.Pendse. 2. In Income Tax Appeal No.186 of 2009 filed by Sudhakar T.Pendse which is disposed of by us today i.e. 22nd April, 2009 we have held that the said amount of Rs.3,17,53,495/- is liable to be taxed as undisclosed income of Sudhakar T.Pendse. In this view of the matter, we see no merits in the present appeal and the same is hereby dismissed with no order as to costs.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan