Itxa/896/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Taxt Central Ii, Mumbai v. Shri Bharat Shantilal Shah

Priya Soparkar 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (IT) NO.896 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income-Tax Central II, Mumbai … Appellant V/s.Shri Bharat Shantilal Shah… Respondent --- Mr.Suresh Kumar, Advocate for the Appellant.Mr.Atul K. Jasani i/by Ms.A. Vissanji, Advocate for theRespondent. --- CORAM : UJJAL BHUYAN & MILIND N. JADHAV, JJ. DATE : JANUARY 28, 2020 P.C.:- 1.In this appeal initially Mr.P.S.Sahadevan, learnedcounsel was the standing counsel of Revenuerepresenting the appellant. 2.It is submitted that Mr.Sahadevan has expired. 3.We have requested Mr.Suresh Kumar, learnedstanding counsel, Revenue to assist the court in thematter. 4.Also heard Mr.Atul K. Jasani, learned counsel for therespondent/assessee. Priya Soparkar 5.It is seen that the disputed claim in this appeal isRs.86,30,210.00. Therefore, the tax effect will be belowthe prescribed limit of Rs.1 crore as enhanced by theCBDT Circular No.17 of 2019 dated 8[th] August, 2019. 6.Mr.Suresh Kumar submits that he has not receivedany instructions from the Department. 7.Be that as it may, in the light of the above, thisappeal would stand disposed of as withdrawn. 8.Needless to say, if it is found that the case is notcovered by the aforesaid circular, appellant would be atliberty to move the court for revival of the appeal. 9.Court fees paid may be refunded as per Rules. (MILIND N. JADHAV, J.) (UJJAL BHUYAN, J.) ….