Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/897/2018 Of Principal Commissioner...

Itxa/897/2018 Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-11 Mumbai v. Supreme Offshore Construction And Technical Services Ltd

High Court 28 Jan 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/897/2018 Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-11 Mumbai v. Supreme Offshore Construction And Technical Services Ltd
Date of order
28 Jan 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/897/2018 Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-11 Mumbai v. Supreme Offshore Construction And Technical Services Ltd, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: 3.Accordingly, the Appeal is dismissed as not pressed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

Priya Soparkar 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.897 OF 2018 Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-11, Mumbai. V/s.Supreme Offshore Construction &Technical Services Ltd. … Appellant … Respondent --- Mr.Arvind Pinto for the Appellant. --- CORAM : AKIL KURESHI AND SANDEEP K.SHINDE, JJ. DATE : JANUARY 28, 2019. P.C.:- 1.This Appeal under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) challenges the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (the Tribunal). 2.Mr.Arvind Pinto, learned Counsel appearing for the Revenue states that he has been instructed not to press this appeal. This for thereason that the tax effect in this appeal is less than Rs.50 lakhs asprovided in CBDT Circular No.3 of 2018 dated 11[th] July, 2018. 3.Accordingly, the Appeal is dismissed as not pressed. 4.Refund of Court Fees, as per Rules. (SANDEEP K.SHINDE, J.) (AKIL KURESHI,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan