Itxa/898/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -18 v. Shri Heman T B. Waigankar (Huf)
High Court
23 Jun 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/898/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -18 v. Shri Heman T B. Waigankar (Huf)
Date of order
23 Jun 2011
Assessment year(s)
2003-04, 2001-02
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itxa/898/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -18 v. Shri Heman T B. Waigankar (Huf), the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: The short question raised in this Appeal is whether the amount of Rs.70,00,000/- received by the assessee are liable to be taxed in the A.Y.
Decision: The appeal is dismissed. [SMT.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
* 1 *
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 898 OF 2011
The Commissioner of Income Tax-18V/S.Shri. Hemant B. Waigankar (HUF)
.....Appellant
....Respondent
* * *
Mr. D.K. Kamwal, Advocate for the appellant.Mr. A.K. Jasani, Advocate for the respondent.
CORAM :- J.P. DEVADHAR, &
SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, JJ.
23[rd] June, 2011.
P.C. :-
1. Heard.
2. The short question raised in this Appeal is whether the amount of Rs.70,00,000/- received by the assessee are liable to be taxed in the A.Y. 2003-04 or in the A.Y. 2001-02. In the original assessment order for A.Y. 2003-04, the Assessing Officer held that the amount of Rs.70,00,000/- are liable to be taxed in the hands of the assessee in A.Y. 2003-04. Challenging the aforesaid order, the assessee filed an appeal before the CIT(A) who held that the said amount of Rs.70,00,000/- are
liable to be taxed for the A.Y. 2001-02.
3. Challenging the aforesaid order, the Revenue filed an appeal before the ITAT. In the meantime, the assessing officer in implementation of the order, issued notice under Setion 148 with a view to re-open A.Y 2001-02 and by an reassessment order dated 28[th ]September, 2007 assessed the amount of Rs.70,00,000/- for A.Y. 2001-02. When the Appeal came up before the ITAT, the Tribunal confirmed the order of CIT (A) and held that the amount of Rs.70,00,000/- are liable to be taxed for A.Y. 2001-02. Challenging the aforesaid order, the revenue has filed the present appeal. Admittedly, though the reassessment order for A.Y. 2001-02 has been made on protective basis, the taxes computed pursuant to the assessment order has already been assessed and that assessment order has attained finality. In these circumstances, we see no reason to interfere in the appeal. The appeal is dismissed.
[SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, J]
[J.P. DEVADHAR, J]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.