In Itxa/899/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax- 17 Mumbai v. Mr. Nandlal M. Gandhi, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is, therefore, dismissed in limini with no order as to costs since no substantial question of law arise in the appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.899 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax
..Appellant.
V/s.
Mr. Nandlal M. Gandhi
..Respondent.
Mr. Suresh Kumar for appellant.
None for respondent.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 10TH AUGUST, 2009.
P.C. :-
Heard learned counsel for the revenue. The issue sought to be raised in the appeal is covered by the judgment of this Court in the case of CIT V/s. Sandhya P. Naik reported in 253 ITR 534. Learned counsel for the revenue could not distinguish the said judgment. In this view of the matter, no fault can be found with the view taken by the Tribunal. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed in limini with no order as to costs since no substantial question of law arise in the appeal.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(V.C.DAGA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue