Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/902/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Itxa/902/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -7, Mumbai v. Zandu Pharmaceuticals Works Limited

High Court 14 Oct 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/902/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -7, Mumbai v. Zandu Pharmaceuticals Works Limited
Date of order
14 Oct 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Itxa/902/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -7, Mumbai v. Zandu Pharmaceuticals Works Limited, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: As regards the second question is concerned, the dispute is whether the wind mill at Jamnagar belonging to the respondent is a part of the Vapi unit so as to proportionately disallow depreciation available to the wind mill while computing deduction to the Vapi Unit under Section 80-IA of the Income...

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
AGK IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.902 OF 2008 WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.903 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income-tax, Mumbai City - 7, ..Appellant. V/s. Zandu Pharmaceuticals Works Ltd., ..Respondent. Mr.Suresh Kumar for the Appellant. Mr.Inamdar with Ms.Aasifa Khan for the Respondent. CORAM : D.K. DESHMUKH & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 14TH OCTOBER, 2008. P.C. : 1. There are two questions raised in this appeal. As regards the first question is concerned, the learned counsel for the appellant fairly states that similar question raised by the revenue in Tax Appeal No.714 of 2008 has been dismissed on 13-10-2008. 2. As regards the second question is concerned, the dispute is whether the wind mill at Jamnagar belonging to the respondent is a part of the Vapi unit so as to proportionately disallow depreciation available to the wind mill while computing deduction to the Vapi Unit under Section 80-IA of the Income Tax Act. The tribunal in para 15 of its order has recorded a finding of fact that the wind mill power project of the assessee near Jamnagar is almost 500 kms away from its Vapi Unit. The tribunal has further recorded a finding that no direct or indirect benefit from the wind mill near Jamnagar is taken by the Vapi Unit and that the revenue has failed to establish the relation between wind mill power project near Jamnagar and the vapi unit. The decision of the tribunal based on the above facts does not give rise to any substantial question of law. Hence, rejected. D.K. DESHMUKH, J. J.P. DEVADHAR, J.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan