In Itxa/902/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,City-16,Mum v. M/S Gitanjali Exports Corporation, the High Court (2009) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.902 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax
..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s. Gitanjali Exports Corporation
..Respondent.
Mr. K.R. Chaudhari i/b. Anuradha Mane for appellant.
Ms. A. Vissanjee with S.J. Mehta for respondent.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 23RD SEPTEMBER, 2009.
P.C. :-
1.On the motion made by learned counsel for the revenue, he is allowed to withdraw the appeal. The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs.
2.Refund of court fees as per rules.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(V.C.DAGA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue