In Itxa/917/2017 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -Central 2 v. M/S. Vakrangee Limited, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.
Decision: 2.In the above view, the appeals is disposed of in terms of theabove Circular.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
917-17-ITXA=.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 917 OF 2017
Pr. Commissioner of Income Taxv/s.
M/s. Vakrangee Ltd.
.. Appellant
.. Respondent
Mr. Suresh Kumar for the appellant None for the respondent
CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & NITIN JAMDAR, J.J.
DATED : 22[nd] OCTOBER, 2019
P.C.
1.The learned Counsel appearing in support of the appeal states
that inspite of his best efforts, no instructions are forthcoming fromthe Revenue. The tax effect involved in this appeal is less than thethreshold limit of Rs.1.00 crore provided in CBDT Circular 17/2019dated 8[th] August, 2019.
2.In the above view, the appeals is disposed of in terms of theabove Circular. Refund of Court fees as per Rules.
(NITIN JAMDAR, J.) (M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue