Itxa/9/2005 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, City-25, Mumbai v. Rohit Ambalal Shah
High Court
22 Oct 2007 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/9/2005 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, City-25, Mumbai v. Rohit Ambalal Shah
Date of order
22 Oct 2007
Assessment year(s)
1997-98
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itxa/9/2005 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, City-25, Mumbai v. Rohit Ambalal Shah, the High Court (2007) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Hence appeal is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.9 OF 2005
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.9 OF 2005
The Commissioner of Income-tax ..Appellant.
V/s.
Rohit Ambalal Shah ..Respondent.
Mr.A.D.Kango with P.S.Sahadevan for appellant.
Mr.A.K.Jasani for respondent.
CORAM : F.I.REBELLO ANDJ.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 22ND OCTOBER, 2007.
DATED : 22ND OCTOBER, 2007.
P.C. :-
P.C. :-
The Tribunal recorded a finding that the
additional income disclosed in the V.D.I.S. proceeding
as return of income was for the period of 1987-88 to
1997-98. On this basis the Tribunal came to the
conclusion that the action of the assessing officer in
holding that the entire income of Rs.4 lakhs was earned
in the assessment year 1997-98 to be arbitrary and on
that basis allowed the appeal filed by the assessee.
This is clearly a finding of fact and no substantial
question of law would arise. Hence appeal is
dismissed.
(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.