Case Law › High Court › Itxa/92/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Inco...

Itxa/92/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Taxpune-V,Pune v. Wighnahar Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd

High Court 17 Dec 2004 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

17 Dec 2004

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In Itxa/92/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Taxpune-V,Pune v. Wighnahar Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd, the High Court (2004) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.92 OF 2004 The Commissioner of Income Tax-V,Pune .. Appellant v/s. Vighnahar Sahakari SakharKarkhana Limited.. Respoondent Ms.S.V.Bharucha i/by Mr.S.S.Sarkar for appellant. CORAM: R.M.LODHA ANDJ.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED:17thDecember, 2004 P.C. Heard. 2. The following substantial question of law has been proposed in the memorandum of appeal:- treating as ’trading receipts"? said to suffer from any legal infirmity. 4. No substantial question of law arises. Dismissed in limine. (R.M.LODHA, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.